Spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome.

We have reviewed our experience with spinal cord stimulation in treating patients with the failed back surgery syndrome and have assessed patient and patient-selection characteristics as predictors of the long-term outcome. Neuroradiological investigations eliminated the possibility of a surgically treatable lesion and electromyogram assessed the chronic radicular suffering in correlation with the complaints and the clinical examination of the patient. Excellent pain relief (75% or more) during 1 week of trial stimulation and no major psychiatric or psychological pathology were criteria of selection. Seventy-eight patients underwent trial stimulation. Fourteen (18%) failed to obtain excellent pain relief during 1 week of stimulation and their electrodes were removed. The remaining 64 underwent an internalization of the system and they were followed by a clinical observation every 3 months and this for a mean follow-up period of 4 years (range: 1-7 years). Thirty-five patients (55%) continued to experience at least 50% of pain relief at the latest follow-up. Fifty-eight patients (90%) were able to reduce their medication, 39 patients (61%) reported a change in lifestyle, in that their ability to perform daily activities had improved significantly. Fifty-three patients (83%) continued to use their device at the latest follow-up.

Pain management in a rheumatology department: a satisfaction survey.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of pain management in a teaching hospital rheumatology department. METHODS: We conducted a satisfaction survey among all the patients admitted to the conventional rheumatology department of our teaching hospital over a 1-month period (88 patients with a mean length of stay of 5 d). The patients were asked to complete a questionnaire on the day of discharge. The professional staff was not informed of the survey. RESULTS: The mean pain severity score at admission (visual analog scale, VAS) was 7.76 +/- 1.76 and the mean score decrease with treatment was 7.27 +/- 2.81. Expected pain relief and actual pain relief were correlated (R = 0.39; P = 0.001). Nearly all the patients (96.1%) reported have been encouraged to communicate about their pain. Information on the treatment was given to 89.3% of the patients; no significant differences in pain severity or pain relief were found between the patients who did and did not receive this information. The patients were satisfied with their management by the physicians (VAS: 8.83 +/- 2.07) and nurses (VAS: 8.68 +/- 1.72). CONCLUSION: Satisfaction with pain management (a subjective criterion) was good in our patients. However, no validated tools for measuring satisfaction are available, and measurements should be repeated to look for improvements over time. Limitations to these results include the placebo effect, the influence of memory, and the effects of the behavior of hospitalized patients. A repeat survey is needed.

pain relief in Thailand.

Pain is a complex problem, for both those who are enduring it and those trying to relieve it. Most people in the developed world have access to adequate treatment and management of pain, the availability of trained and educated doctors and nurses, feasible opioid prescribing policies, as well as ready access to appropriate medication. Often, this is not the case in developing countries such as Thailand. This paper is based on recent experience in the southeast of Thailand providing pain relief for persons with HIV and AIDS in Rayong Province at the Camillian Social Centre. The severity and frequency of pain endured by this group of individuals presented a daily challenge. Problems encountered in providing pain relief for these patients and some potential solutions are described. There is a lack of literature on pain relief in Thailand.

Spinal epidural stimulation for central pain caused by spinal cord lesion

Epidural spinal cord stimulation was carried out in 4 patients with denervation caused by spinal cord lesion, and we reviewed previously reported cases. Initial result showed at 1 week in 100% of our cases, but about 1/3 of the cases, even those with the same denervation caused by spinal cord lesion, had no pain relief at this stage in previously reported cases. In our cases, excellent pain relief was gained temporarily, even though the painful area and the spinal cord lesion were separated somatotopically in 2 cases (case 3, 4). Temporary success bore no relationship to quality and duration of pain. In all cases except case 1, a rapidly decreasing effectiveness was noted, and finally no pain relief was gained at all after 4, 3 and 5 months, respectively. In case 1 there was persistent pain relief estimated at 70-80% after 19 months, only when the spinal cord was stimulated. Epidural stimulation also produced sensations in the painful area. Spinal cord stimulation would suppress at least the dorsal horn neurons which were destroyed by various kinds of diseases. A decline in effectiveness with time would occur due to essential causes of the deafferentation pain, such as anatomical and regeneration factors.

Continuous epidural analgesia for painless labor does not increase the incidence of cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: Continuous epidural analgesia is a popular technique provided for labor pain relief. However, the possible association between epidural analgesia and increased rate of cesarean delivery is always a concern. The purpose of this study was to explore if epidural analgesia would affect the rate of cesarean delivery in healthy term parturient women. METHODS: A retrospective review of obstetric records of 822 parturients was done to compute the proportions and odds ratio of cesarean delivery between parturients receiving epidural analgesia for labor pain relief and those not receiving. RESULTS: Results indicated that the overall proportion of cesarean delivery was 11.1% in the epidural group as against 16.2% in the control group and the odds ratio was 0.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.37 to 1.08). The difference between groups was not statistically significant. However, for nulliparous women alone, the proportions of cesarean delivery were 11.6% and 25.1% in exposure group and control group respectively. The odds ratio was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.20 to 0.71). This difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The findings may support the conclusion that continuous epidural analgesia for pain relief during labor would not increase the rate of cesarean delivery. In contrast, it may reduce this risk in nulliparas.

Radiotherapy for pain relief in locally recurrent colorectal cancer.

Eighteen patients with local recurrence of colorectal cancer have been treated by external beam radiotherapy for pain relief. Seven received a fractionated course of 4500cGy and the remainder received single fractions of 1000cGy, a number being treated more than once. The median survival for all patients once recurrence had produced pain was 7 months. Treatment benefit was recorded in 71% treated by fractionated courses and in 66% by single fractions. The duration of pain relief was 3 months for each method. The repeatability of single fraction treatment indicates that this is a worthwhile alternative technique, particularly for those in poor general condition.

Microsurgical DREZotomy for pain of spinal cord and Cauda equina injury origin: clinical characteristics of pain and implications for surgery in a series of 26 patients.

The result of the DREZotomy procedure used for the treatment of chronic intractable neuropathic pain caused by injuries at the T9-L4 spine level in 26 patients has been reported. For the purpose of identifying the most favorable pain pattern for DREZ surgery we retrospectively analyzed the effectiveness of surgical treatment on different forms of pain in the follow-up period of 13-50 months, 37 months on average. All pain forms were classified according to subjective sensory pain expression including the rhythm and topography of the pain. Three groups of pain were formed according to subjective sensory equivalents: pain of thermal quality (burning, boiling, baking, warm etc.), pain of mechanical-nonthermal quality (shooting, cutting, stabbing, sharp, incisive, cramping, constriction, distraction, throbbing etc.). The third group was the combination of the previous two. Success in pain relief has been defined as a 50% or greater reduction in pain after surgery such that pain no longer interferes with patient activities of daily living and sleeping pattern and no longer requires routine analgesic pain medication. Our results revealed that the pain of mechanical-nonthermal nature and intermittent rhythm, confined to segmental topography was the most responsive to the DREZ surgical treatment so that 90% patients suffering from this pain pattern experienced a good long-term pain relief (70% had complete long term pain relief). Neuropathic pain of thermal quality with the diffuse infralesional distribution and steady rhythm was the most resistant to the DREZ surgical treatment: neither patient had long-term relief of this pain pattern. In the group of patients suffering from pain consisting of combined mechanical and thermal sensory components with confined pain territory, 75% experienced a good long-term pain relief (50% had complete long-term pain relief). Immediate pain relief was obtained in 88% of patients and was long lasting in 69% of the total series. Our results pointed to confined territory, intermittent rhythm and mechanical nature of the pain as the most relevant predictors of the expected pain relief achieved by the DREZ surgery.

Postoperative analgesia after total hip arthroplasty: i.v. PCA with morphine, patient-controlled epidural analgesia, or continuous "3-in-1" block?: a prospective evaluation by our acute pain service in more than 1,300 patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the most appropriate postoperative analgesic technique after hip surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 1,338 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients scheduled for elective unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). INTERVENTIONS: During the first 48 postoperative hours, pain relief was provided by intravenous (i.v.) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine (Group 1), continuous "3-in-1" block (Group 2), or patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) (Group 3). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During a 7.5-year period, pain scores, supplemental analgesia, satisfaction score, technical problems, and side effects were collected by our acute pain service. Postoperative pain relief was comparable in the three groups. More paracetamol was required in Group 2 (1.0 +/- 1.2 g/48 h) and Group 3 (0.9 +/- 1.3 g/48 h) than in Group 1 (0.5 +/- 1.1 g/48 h) (p < 0.01). However, only 8% of patients in Group 2 and 12% of patients in Group 3 needed an opioid. A higher incidence of technical problems was noted in Group 3 (23.4%) than in Group 1 (2.3%) or Group 2 (5.5%) (p < 0.001). A lower incidence of side effects was observed in Group 2 (23.5%) when compared with Group 1 (58.8%) and Group 3 (71.9%) (p < 0.001). Satisfaction score was significantly higher in Group 2 than in the other two groups [80 +/- 16 vs. 87 +/- 14 vs. 81 +/- 14 in Groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively (p = 0.003)]. CONCLUSION: After THA, i.v. PCA with morphine, continuous "3-in-1" block, and PCEA provided comparable pain relief. Because it induces the fewest technical problems and side effects, continuous "3-in-1" block is the preferred technique.

Evaluation of selective lumbar radiculography and radicular block

We analyzed 56 patients who received selective lumbar radiculography and radicular block (88 procedures in total). The underlying conditions were spinal diseases in 43 cases, cancer pain in 6 cases, post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) in 5 cases and reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) in 2 cases. In the spinal disease group, 24 cases showed complete pain relief and 12 cases showed partial pain relief after the therapy, with a success rate of 83.7%. In the cancer pain group, 3 cases showed complete pain relief and one showed partial pain relief (success rate: 66.7%). In the PHN group, 1 case showed complete pain relief and 2 showed partial pain relief (success rate: 60%). In the RSD group, all cases showed pain relief. When examined 3 months after this treatment, the effect had persisted in 15 cases from the spinal disease group, in 1 case from the cancer pain group, in 2 cases from the PHN group and in 2 cases from the RSD group. Selective lumbar radiculography and radicular block are useful in identifying a nerve root responsible for abnormalities. In addition, this procedure is expected to exert a long-lasting therapeutic effect in cases indicated for the procedure.

Pain problems in oncology

1. Not every cancer patient suffers from pain, but approximately 30-40% of regular inpatients and 60-70% in terminal stages do. 2. Not every pain syndrome in a cancer patient is tumor-derived: its role and potential cause need to be thoroughly investigated and treated. 3. Successful antineoplastic treatment is the best and most durable pain prophylaxis in advanced cancer patients. 4. Locally applicable pain treatments such as anesthesiologic, radiotherapeutic and surgical measures should be discussed on an interdisciplinary basis. 5. With chronic tumor pain and no further effect of antineoplastic and locally active treatments, pharmacologic analgesia is the most adequate method of effective pain relief. 6. Prophylactic prescription of effective analgesics in adequate doses and at regular intervals, according to accepted "pain-ladders", is the most successful method of effective and lasting pain relief. 7. Public and medical bias against adequate use of oral opiates in chronic cancer pain must be overcome. 8. Effective pain relief leads to improvement of life quality as well as social reintegration of late stage cancer patients. 9. The influence of psychosocial variables on pain perception and the outcome of analgesia should not be underestimated.