Assessing pain and pain relief in geriatric patients with non-pathological fractures with different rating scales.

Although pain is a frequent problem among elderly patients, they are often omitted in clinical trials and few studies have focused on assessing pain relief in this population. The aim of this study was to compare geriatric patients' verbally reported effect of analgesics with changes in pain experience rated with four different rating scales: the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Graphic Rating Scale (GRS), the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and the pain relief Scale (PRS). Altogether 53 geriatric patients (mean=82 yrs) with non-pathological fractures in 4 geriatric units at a large university hospital were selected. In connection with the administration of analgesics, the patients were asked to "Mark the point that corresponds to your experience of pain just now at rest" on the VAS, GRS and NRS. This was repeated after 1.5-2 hours, and a direct question was asked about whether the analgesic medication given in connection with the initial assessment had had any pain-alleviation effect. Two comparisons were conducted with each patient. The results show that the probability of accomplishing a rating on the VAS, GRS, NRS, and PRS was lower with advancing age in these elderly fracture patients. The correlations between the ratings of the VAS, GRS and NRS were strong and significant (r=0.80-0.95; p<0.001) both at the initial assessments and at the re-assessments. However, the verbally reported effects of the analgesics were often directly opposite to the changes in rated pain. Therefore, application of the VAS, NRS, GRS and PRS for the purpose of assessing pain relief must be combined with supplementary questions that allow the patient to verbally describe possible experience of pain relief.

Response of intractable pain to continuous intrathecal morphine: a retrospective study.

We have treated 37 patients with intractable pain (35 with cancer-related pain) by continuous intrathecal morphine infusion via implanted pump. These patients were carefully selected according to specific criteria, and each demonstrated a significant reduction in pain following a test dose of intrathecal morphine. All patients had good pain relief from intrathecal morphine infusion, even with pain located in cervical dermatomes. Systemic narcotics could be withdrawn from most patients. Significant side effects were rare and typically self-limited. Many patients required gradually increasing doses, seemingly related to disease progression. Two patients with non-malignant pain have had variable dose requirements over 28 and 44 months without clear tolerance. In these patients we observed a reduction in side effects associated with systemic opioids when continuous intrathecal opioid infusion was instituted. Intrathecal opioid administration may have fewer complications than ablative pain relief procedures. In properly selected patients, this method offers an effective alternative for pain relief.

Sublingual buprenorphine for premedication and postoperative pain relief in orthopaedic surgery.

The effect of sublingual buprenorphine (Temgesic) as a premedicant and for postoperative pain relief compared with morphine/pethidine was studied in 50 patients scheduled for elective surgery of the knee joint. Twenty-five patients received buprenorphine 0.4 mg sublingually 1 h before surgery and the same dose on demand postoperatively. Twenty-five patients were given morphine intramuscularly (7.5 mg or 10 mg to females and males respectively) 1 h preoperatively. This group received pethidine (75 mg) intramuscularly on demand postoperatively. All the patients were anaesthetized with halothane N2O/O2 after induction with thiopentone. No significant differences were found with regard to sedation, dizziness, nausea and vomiting during the study period. Emergence shivering, confusion and restlessness just after termination of the operation were equal in the two groups. In the recovery room, however, there was a higher frequency of shivering (P less than 0.05) in the morphine group. During the first 24 h postoperatively the buprenorphine group was given an average of 3.8 doses compared with 2.3 in the pethidine group (P greater than 0.05). It is concluded, that buprenorphine sublingually is as good as morphine intramuscularly for premedication and therefore should be recommended to patients who wish to avoid injections. For postoperative pain relief the initial dose of buprenorphine should be given intravenously. Only minor and unimportant side effects were seen.

The plasticity of cutaneous hyperalgesia during sympathetic ganglion blockade in patients with neuropathic pain.

In order to investigate the plasticity of cutaneous sensory abnormalities in neuropathic pain, we monitored sensory and vasomotor effects of diagnostic sympathetic ganglion blocks in 24 patients, who suffered from chronic pain and cutaneous hyperalgesia following peripheral nerve or tissue injury. Ongoing pain was rated on a visual analogue scale, and pain evoked by innocuous tactile and cooling stimuli (hyperalgesia) on a verbal rating scale. Skin temperatures were determined at symmetric sites. In two patients, cutaneous blood flow was measured with a laser Doppler device. The sympathetic blocks led to a significant reduction of the group mean ongoing pain (40%) and cutaneous hyperalgesia (50%). Between patients, however, there was a large variability that could not be related merely to adequacy of sympathetic blockade. Neither the magnitude of change in skin temperature nor the final skin temperature after the block correlated with the amount of pain relief. The relief of hyperalgesia, however, correlated with the relief of ongoing pain. Nine patients experienced pain relief of greater than 50%. In these patients, the time course of hyperalgesia relief was similar to the time course of relief of ongoing pain. pain relief occurred simultaneously with or a few minutes before cutaneous vasodilatation. During the block, even vigorous mechanical or cold stimuli did not rekindle hyperalgesia. In all patients, pain and hyperalgesia returned within a day after the block. In three patients tested, passive warming of the limb to the temperature achieved by the sympathetic block had negligible effects on pain and hyperalgesia. The hyperalgesia of sympathetically maintained pain is thought to be due to sensitization of central pain-signalling neurons to mechanoreceptor input. The present data indicate that this sensitization is highly plastic even when the disease has persisted for months or years. It could be reversed within minutes by a sympathetic blockade, but returned when sympathetic block subsided. Mechanoreceptor input by itself was not sufficient to maintain or rekindle the central sensitization. This supports the hypothesis that low-grade activity of nociceptors, possibly due to development of alpha-adrenergic sensitivity after injury, is involved in the maintenance of central sensitization.

Perceptions of pain and pain relief in labour: the gulf between experience and observation.

In a national sample of 10,702 women delivered in one week in 1990 data on their perceptions of pain and the effectiveness of pain relief methods were compared with those of the professionals attending them. Professionals' conceptions of pain relief tended to be restricted to pharmacological methods. Overall, the level of agreement about effectiveness of pain relief was quite low, with medical staff commonly believing they were providing adequate pain relief while the women reported it as unsatisfactory. This was particularly the case for pethidine, while 'Entonox' was rated more highly by women than staff. Professionals were significantly more likely to agree with one another about effectiveness than to agree with the women, and were less likely to have responded where the women judged their pain relief as poor.

Continuous epidural infusion of morphine for pain relief after cardiac operations.

Postoperative pain relief and stress hormones were examined during the use of continuous epidural infusion of morphine at a rate of 0.1 mg/hr in 30 patients (Group B) after coronary artery bypass grafting. This was compared to our routine method of postoperative analgesia of intravenous morphine 2 mg/2 hr and as needed in another 30 patients (Group A). Continuous epidural morphine infusion required occasional supplementation with intravenous morphine and achieved effective analgesia in 80% of the patients. pain relief was adequate in 50% of the patients in Group A. The mean dose of morphine used in Group B during the first 3 postoperative days was 5 mg per patient per day and was significantly lower than that used in Group A (mean 18 mg per patient per day). Serum morphine was undetectable (below 2.5 ng/ml) in Group B and was significantly lower than that in Group A (17 ng/ml). Epidural analgesia was associated with adequate postoperative pulmonary and cardiovascular functions; nausea and vomiting occurred in two patients. Levels of postoperative stress, serum cortisol, and beta-endorphin were significantly lower in Group B than in Group A. This study shows that continuous epidural infusion of morphine at a rate of 0.1 mg/hr provides selective and effective pain relief and reduces postoperative stress after cardiac operations. This method of analgesia was also associated with minimal side effects and provides an alternate approach for treatment of pain after cardiac operations.

Outcomes for surgical management of orchalgia in patients with identifiable intrascrotal lesions.

OBJECTIVE: The outcome of surgery for relief of orchalgia in patients with identifiable intrascrotal pathology is not well defined. We evaluated the success of commonly performed surgical procedure indicated for pain relief in patients with specific intrascrotal lesions. METHODS: Surgical cases performed for relief of painful scrotal pathology were reviewed, including ligation of internal spermatic vein, hydrocelectomy, spermatocelectomy, and orchiopexy for suspected intermittent torsion. Relief of pain as reported to the physician and time for return to full activity were determined. pain relief was compared to a 50% placebo rate using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Eigthy-five of 151 patients (56%) undergoing surgery for pain relief had complete data and adequate follow-up for analysis. Of 40 patients who had ligation of the internal spermatic vein, 30 (75%) were relieved of pain (p = 0.037). All 19 patients with painful hydroceles and 16 of 17 (94%) with spermatoceles were relieved of pain (p < 0.001). Of 9 patients undergoing scrotal orchiopexy for suspected intermittent torsion, 8 (89%) were pain-free (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgical management of specific intrascrotal lesions is highly effective.

The incidence of cancer pain and improvement of pain management in Japan.

A nation-wide survey (1987) of cancer pain and analgesic methods showed that the incidence of pain in the terminal stage was in the range of 68 to 72% without any significant difference between hospital groups. Irrespective of the stage of illness, a certain analgesic effect was obtainable with oral/parenteral use of opioids. As a result of a year-to-year comparison of pain in cancer clinics, it was found that the rate of complete pain relief has increased for all stages of illness, especially in the terminal stage. Here the rate of complete pain relief steadily increased from 37.8% in 1986 to 42.7% in 1987 and 48.6% in 1988. Propagation of WHO-advocated cancer pain therapeutics has led to an improvement of the rate of pain relief in the terminal stage. Marketing of MS Contin tablets resulted in a dramatic increase in the consumption of morphine, but there was no increase in the rate of pain relief due to poor measures to counter adverse reactions, and to administration of morphine in insufficient doses. The consumption of morphine for medical use increased year by year, but a greater number of doctors experienced in the use of opioids would further improve the management of pain. To realize that, it would be necessary to incorporate terminal care into medical education programmes as soon as possible. Further efforts will be required for extensive research and propagation of analgesic methods in various fields including education in medicine, science of nursing and postgraduate education.

A randomized, placebo controlled, trial of preoperative sustained release Betamethasone plus non-controlled intraoperative Ketorolac or Fentanyl on pain after diagnostic laparoscopy or laparoscopic tubal ligation [ISRCTN52633712].

BACKGROUND: Gynecological laparoscopic surgery procedures are often complicated by postoperative pain resulting in an unpleasant experience for the patient, delayed discharge, and increased cost. Glucocorticosteroids have been suggested to reduce the severity and incidence of postoperative pain. METHODS: This study examines the efficacy of a sustained release betamethasone preparation to reduce postoperative pain and the requirement for pain relief drugs after either diagnostic laparoscopy or tubal ligation. Patients were recruited, as presenting, after obtaining informed consent. Prior to surgery, patients were randomly selected by a computer generated table to receive either pharmacy-coded betamethasone (12 mg IM Celestone trade mark ) or an optically identical placebo injection of Intralipid trade mark and isotonic saline mixture. The effect of non-controlled prophylactic intraoperative treatment with either fentanyl or ketorolac per surgeon's orders was also noted in this study. Blood samples taken at recovery and at discharge times were extracted and analyzed for circulating betamethasone. Visual analog scale data on pain was gathered at six post-recovery time points in a triple blind fashion and statistically compared. The postoperative requirement for pain relief drugs was also examined. RESULTS: Although the injection achieved a sustained therapeutic concentration, no beneficial effect of IM betamethasone on postoperative pain or reduction in pain relief drugs was observed during the postoperative period. Indeed, the mean combined pain scores during the 2 hour postoperative period, adjusted for postoperative opioids as the major confounding factor, were higher approaching statistical significance (P = 0.056) in the treatment group. Higher pain scores were also observed for the tubal ligation patients relative to diagnostic laparoscopy. Intraoperative fentanyl treatment did not significantly lower the average pain score during the 2 hour postoperative period. Intraoperative ketorolac treatment significantly lowered (P = 0.027) pain scores and reduced the postoperative requirement for additional pain relief drugs. CONCLUSIONS: There was a lack of efficacy of preoperative sustained release betamethasone in reducing postoperative pain despite maintaining a therapeutic concentration during the postoperative period. Intraoperative Ketorolac did afford some short-term pain relief in the postoperative period and reduced the need for additional pain relief drugs.

Interpleural administration of 1.0% and 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine for pain relief after thoracotomy

pain relief following thoracotomy and arterial concentration profiles after interpleural administration of lidocaine were studied in 23 adult patients. They were allocated to three groups and given interpleural injection of 20 ml each of 1.0% (group 1, N = 9, non-pneumonectomy patients), 1.5% (group 2, N = 10, non-pneumonectomy patients), and 1.5% (group 3, N = 4, pneumonectomy patients) lidocaine with epinephrine (5 micrograms.ml-1). Complete pain relief was obtained within 20 min after injection in all patients. The mean duration of analgesia was 2.8 hr, 3.1 hr, and 5.1 hr in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The maximum plasma concentrations of lidocaine (Cmax) were 1.7 +/- 1.0 (mean +/- SD) microgram.ml-1, 2.2 +/- 0.6 micrograms.ml-1, and 0.7 +/- 0.2 micrograms.ml-1 in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The mean duration of analgesia was significantly longer in group 3 than in group 2 (P less than 0.01). Cmax was significantly lower in group 3 than in group 2 (P less than 0.01). In conclusion, we consider interpleural injection of lidocaine with epinephrine to be an effective method of providing postoperative analgesia after thoracotomy. Our data also suggest that the duration of analgesia may increase and the plasma levels of lidocaine may remain quite low in total pneumonectomy patients, because local anesthetic solution is not absorbed through the visceral pleura but absorbed only through the parietal pleura alone in these patients.