Cervical radiculopathy: open study on percutaneous periradicular foraminal steroid infiltration performed under CT control in 30 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cervical radiculopathy is a common entity that can become unremitting, seriously disrupting the patient's work and social activities. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, tolerance, and efficacy of transforaminal periganglionic steroid infiltration under CT control. METHODS: Thirty patients with cervical radiculopathy, despite at least 1 month of appropriate medical treatment, underwent percutaneous periradicular foraminal steroid infiltration under CT control. Sixteen patients had foraminal degenerative stenosis, and 14 patients had disk herniation. The intensity of radicular pain was scored on an analogic visual scale (AVS). pain relief was classified as excellent when the pain had diminished by 75% or more; good, by 50%-74%; fair by 25%-49%; or poor, by less than 25%. The patients were followed up at 2 weeks and at 6 months. RESULTS: No local complications occurred after the procedure. The mean AVS pain scores were 6.5 points before the procedure and 3.3 points 2 weeks after, with significant pain relief (P <.001). pain relief was excellent in 11 patients (37%) and good in seven patients (23%). There was no rebound of pain at the 6-month follow-up. The duration of symptoms before infiltration and the intensity and cause of radiculalgia were not predictive of radicular pain relief. CONCLUSION: Intraforaminal cervical infiltration produced substantial sustained pain relief, whatever the cause of the radiculalgia. The CT approach ensures the safety of vital structures and allows the precise injection of a steroid specifically targeted to the ganglia.

Non-prosthetic management of grade IV osteochondral lesions of the glenohumeral joint.

Osteochondral lesions of the glenohumeral joint in early stages and in younger patients are an important problem and present a challenge during clinical decision making. Although prosthetic arthroplasty remains the gold standard for treatment in later stages of the disease, alternatives are desirable in the early stages and in young patients. The purposes of this study are to evaluate the results of arthroscopic debridement and capsular release in patients with grade IV osteochondral lesions of the glenohumeral joint and to determine the factors associated with their success. Sixty-one patients with grade IV osteochondral lesions of the glenohumeral articular surfaces were treated with arthroscopic debridement, with or without arthroscopic capsular release. Standardized data collection was performed at the initial office visit and at the time of final follow-up. Overall outcome was analyzed with regard to patients' self-assessment of pain, function, improvement, satisfaction, and duration of pain relief. Forty-five of the patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Time-to-event analysis was used to evaluate the duration of pain relief. The mean patient satisfaction score (0 = not satisfied; 10 = completely satisfied) improved from 0.67 preoperatively to 6.28 at final follow-up (P <.0001), with 87% of patients indicating that they would have the surgery again. Although workers' compensation patients obtained inferior results, significant improvement in pain and function was obtained in 88% of all patients (P <.0001). Most patients noted the onset of pain relief within 5 weeks of surgery and obtained a duration of pain relief of 28 months or greater (P <.05). The addition of concomitant procedures, such as acromioplasty, distal clavicle resection, labral debridement, or labral repair, did not have a negative impact on the functional results after arthroscopic debridement and capsular release. In well-selected patients with grade IV osteochondral lesions of the glenohumeral joint, significant improvements in pain relief and function follow arthroscopic debridement of the glenohumeral joint. Arthroscopic capsular release can be added in patients with a loss of passive arcs of shoulder motion. Osteochondral lesions greater than 2 cm(2) appear to be associated with return of pain and failure of this procedure.

Pituitary alcohol injection for cancer pain. Use in a district general hospital.

The use of trans-sphenoidal pituitary alcohol injection was assessed in a district general hospital for the treatment of diffuse bilateral cancer pain in 26 patients. Fourteen patients received a total of 43 injections. Hormonal and non-hormonal dependent cancers were treated, with complete pain relief in ten patients and partial relief in a further seven patients. The duration of relief was variable, and usually less than 6 weeks, although two patients had complete pain relief for 5 and 7 months respectively. No cases of meningitis or cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea occurred. Nasal antiseptics and vasoconstrictors were not used. Temporary pupil dilatation occurred in eight patients, of whom one had prolonged blurred vision for small print. Transient diabetes insipidus was common (53%), although only five patients needed permanent treatment. Death from their disease occurred in 65% of patients within 3 months. Survival was shorter than in series from specialist centres, suggesting later referral for pain relief. The technique is an inexpensive and valid form of treatment for cancer pain in a district hospital, but should not be undertaken lightly in view of the possible complications.

Personal control in pain relief during labour.

Personal control is a central feature of women's involvement in their childbirth experiences. To achieve this control tacit rules and guidelines are applied to define how women and the professionals who care for them should behave. This study investigated the extent to which women exercised control in pain relief during the first stage of labour by comparing (a) the rules which they held prior to childbirth (2-3 cm cervical dilatation) with those which they afterwards felt applied to their labour and (b) the rules held by the women before and after childbirth with those held by the midwives. In a quantitative study using a repeated measures design, a questionnaire was administered to 35 midwives and to 100 women prior to and within 24 hours following their delivery. Consistency of the women's scores before and after childbirth, indicated by few statistically significant differences, tended to confirm their rules on control of pain relief. Some of the rules were held even more strongly following childbirth. A surprising finding was the even stronger agreement by midwives with some of the rules. There was a definite trend for many of the rules held by the women prior to childbirth to increase following birth towards those of the midwives. This could be the result of the experience of childbirth per se but the possibility that it was contributed to by the influence of the midwives cannot be ruled out and warrants further research. An interesting hierarchy in the rules for compliance with professional care has been highlighted.